Image from plus.google.com
The flipped classroom instructional model, that I have implemented in such an all-or-nothing fashion, appears to be just the tip of the blended learning iceberg. As soon as I realized that the flipped model was considered one of many blended learning models, I wanted to investigate further. I certainly have my hands, and head, full with all I am learning and practicing with the flip, but is there more? Is there something even better just below the surface? Can I transform my classroom in an even more dynamic fashion?
Blended Learning Taxonomy
Blended learning consists of 4 different models: rotation, flex, self-blended, and enriched virtual. The rotation model is the lite version which includes the flipped classroom, as well as the station-rotation model, the lab-rotation model, and the individual-rotation model. All of these models incorporate at least one online “rotation”. So in the flipped model the content delivery is online, and the rotation in the brick and mortar classroom may include small group instruction, tutoring, teacher guided practice, or projects. The flex model “backbone” is online learning. The teacher provides varying levels of face-to-face support and tutoring with the learning customized for each student. In the self-blended model, also known as the “a la carte” model, students take one or more online classes. They might take them from on campus or not. The final model is the enriched virtual. This one is different from flipped, because students might not attend the campus every day, and it differs from the a la carte model in that it’s not a course by course experience, but a “whole-school” experience.
It is no secret that I love the flipped instructional model. I love it for many reasons, which you can learn about, if I get accepted to present at the EARCOS conference next March.:) Yes, I just put a smiley face…deal with it. But, I must admit the “enriched virtual model” of blended learning really appeals. That appeal comes out of the connection to some TED talks I have watched recently about the future of learning. One was by Trung Le, a school designer, a bricks and mortar school designer. He explains how important it is for the design to enhance learning, which for him means connected, global, and powered by technology. The design has to totally change the culture of schools.
Image by Albeiro Rodas
The other talk I am reminded of is Will Richardson’s in which he says we have to do school differently, not better; especially if by “better”, we mean improved standardized test scores. Richardson says, “Information and knowledge are everywhere, not just in schools.” and “Our students can learn whatever they want, whenever they want.” So how do we do it differently?
Here’s what I struggle with…I want to be a part of this type of school. A place where the learning is student-led, chosen by students, and the teachers get to be the mentor who encourages and inspires students to reach their full potential in whatever field or discipline that might be. But, how does it happen? Do I just start doing it and hope I don’t get in trouble with administration and parents? Does it need to be a top-down cultural change? And, how do I implement it? I need help and collaboration to figure out the big picture of what it looks like? This would be my dream job…no, just my dream. It would be so amazing, it wouldn’t even feel like a job!